Argument from a proper basis
The Argument from a proper basis is an ontological argument for the existence of God related to fideism. Alvin Plantinga argued that belief in God is a properly basic belief, and so no basis for belief in God is necessary.[1]
Also See
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Apologetics |
|
General
|
|
|
|
Bahá'í
|
|
|
|
Christian
|
|
|
|
Muslim
|
Muslim apologists
|
|
|
| Conceptions of God |
|
Divine presence
|
|
|
|
God as the
|
|
|
|
God in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singular God
|
|
|
|
Binitarianism
|
|
|
|
Trinitarianism
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
| Eschatology |
|
|
| Existence of God |
|
arguments against
|
|
|
|
arguments for
|
|
|
|
| Opposition to religion |
|
|
| Theism |
|
|
| Theologies |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
|
|
|
Schools by religious affiliation
|
Bahá'í · Buddhist · Anglican · Assemblies of God · Baptist · Eastern Orthodox · Hindu · Islamic · Jewish · Latter Day Saints · Lutheran · Mennonite · Methodist · Nondenominational Christian · Presbyterian · Quaker · Roman Catholic · Seventh-Day Adventist
|
|
|
| Resources |
|
|
| Practitioners |
Teachers · Theologians
|
|